Marko Djokovic vs Carlos Poch-Gradin Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L L W W W L L
Form
L L L L W L L W W LHead-2-Head: Djokovic 0 - 0 Poch-Gradin
They have played 0 sets in total, with Djokovic winning 0 and Poch-Gradin winning 0. The last match between Djokovic and Poch-Gradin was at the Seville Challenger, 07-09-2013, Q1 round, Clay with Marko Djokovic getting the victory w/o.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Marko Djokovic | 0 |
| Carlos Poch-Gradin | 0 |
Seville Challenger(07-09-2013)
| Djokovic | Stats | Poch-Gradin |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 571 | Highest Rank | 215 |
| 33 | Age | 42 |
| - | Plays | L |
| 1 | Titles | 6 |
| 43% (71-94) | Career Total W/L | 53% (316-282) |
| $1,650 | Career Prize Money | $11,440 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cobolli VS Rune PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Korda VS Cina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Djokovic VS Poch-Gradin H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Marko Djokovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Gian Marco Moroni
Player
Marko Djokovic
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Marko Djokovic
78%
(
62 of
80)
1st Serve %
50%
(
36 of
72)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marko Djokovic
Player
Johan Sebastien Tatlot
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Marko Djokovic
Player
Jeroen Vanneste
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marko Djokovic
Player
Miljan Zekic
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jan Satral
Player
Marko Djokovic
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
30%
(
17 of
57)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
3-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nikola Cacic
Player
Marko Djokovic
47%
(
28 of
60)
1st Serve %
40%
(
26 of
65)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Marko Djokovic
76%
(
65 of
86)
1st Serve %
38%
(
38 of
100)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
52 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marko Djokovic
Player
Inigo Cervantes
43%
(
26 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Carlos Gomez-Herrera
Player
Marko Djokovic
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Carlos Poch-Gradin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laurent Lokoli
Player
Carlos Poch-Gradin
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
48%
(
43 of
89)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
10
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
16 of
46)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
89)
87
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sami Reinwein
Player
Carlos Poch-Gradin
63%
(
74 of
117)
1st Serve %
62%
(
66 of
106)
13
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
46 of
66)
67%
(
29 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
42 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
106)
113
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(4) 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jorge Hernando-Ruano
Player
Carlos Poch-Gradin
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 43% (71/94) | Win/Loss | 53% (316/282) |
| 44% (163/207) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (717/645) |
| 48% (1641/1777) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (6548/6118) |
| 48% (20/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 44% (31/39) |
| 43% (46/61) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (281/235) |
| 31% (5/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 36% (4/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 85 | Aces Total | 78 |
| 0.09 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.02 |
| 150 | Total Double Faults | 119 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 635.48 | Average Opponent Rank | 534.85 |
| 54% (1411/2609) | 1st Serve % | 59% (1177/2007) |
| 64% (900/1411) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (811/1177) |
| 45% (534/1198) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (393/830) |
| 38% (101/266) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (55/150) |
| 38% (952/2495) | Return Points Win % | 36% (732/2054) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 17% (1/5) |
| 10% (1/9) | Main Tour W/L | 30% (3/7) |
| 35% (15/28) | Challenger W/L | 49% (109/112) |
| 49% (54/57) | Futures W/L | 56% (203/158) |
| 41% (65/158) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (309/590) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 35% (15/43) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (76/158) |
| 39% (17/44) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (82/176) |
| 78% (74/58) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (331/274) |
| 22% (74/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (331/57) |
| 12% (90/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (266/38) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
